Answered by Shaykh Omar Subedar
Question:
Assalamualikum, I have learned that the difference between Ahl al-Sunna and other groups is the method in defining Imän. My question is, did Imam Abu Hanëfa define Imän differently than Ahl al-Sunna? According to him;
Answer:
The Definition of Ëmän
There are differences between the scholars of the Ahl al Sunna wal Jamä`a over the definition of ëmän.
Imam Bukhäri states, “Emän is a declaration and an action.”
Other scholars say, “Emän is to be convinced with the inner heart, to affirm with the tongue and to carry out actions with various parts of the body.” This description has been provided by the Ĥadëth Scholars (Muĥaddithën).
Imam Abu Hanëfa and the Islamic Theologians (Mutakallimën) claim, “Emän is to be convinced with the inner heart. Affirming [the faith] with the tongue is a condition (sharţ) to enforce the sacred law [upon a person] whereas doing righteous actions is the result of being convinced and among the fruits of ëmän.”
Imam Abu Hanëfa and Imam Tahäwi have also been recorded to have said that affirmation with the tongue is an integral pillar (rukn) of ëmän. According to another account Imam Abu Hanëfa and the Islamic Theologians (Mutakallimën) have declared the verbal affirmation to be a condition (sharţ).
In any case the point that is being made is that the Islamic Theologians and Imam Abu Hanëfa have described ëmän as ‘being convinced with the inner heart’ and have deemed [righteous] actions to be the result and the fruit of ëmän.
The Reason for these Differences
Shaykh Al Hind has explained, “The difference [in the description of ëmän between the Mutakallimën and the Muĥaddithën] is really due to the conditions that rose in each party’s respected era. During the time of the Greatest Imam, Abu Hanëfa and the Mutakallimën the Mu`tazila and the Khawärij had a tremendous influence on society. These people emphasized that [righteous] deeds are a part [i.e. an integral pillar] of ëmän. If a person failed to observe them he would end up in the fire [of Hell] forever. They also considered a person guilty of enormities to be out of the fold of ëmän. Therefore, in order to refute their claims, the Mutakallimën and Abu Hanëfa adopted this stance in which they stated that ëmän is simply being convinced with the inner heart. [Righteous] actions are only the result and fruits of ëmän, not its component.
The Muĥaddithën on the other hand lived in an era in which the [the corruption of the] Murji`a was very strong [in society]. These people attached absolutely no importance to [righteous] actions and claimed: Obedience [to the Creator] is of no benefit and being disobedient [to Him] does no harm [to one’s spirituality]. In order to rebut their crooked notions the Muĥaddithën declared [righteous] deeds to be a component of ëmän so that their significance would remain [in the hearts of the laity].
This is why a difference exists [between the Mutakallimën and the Muĥaddithën] over the description of ëmän. In reality neither group refuses to believe in the importance of [righteous] actions, for both believe that observing [righteous] deeds are necessary [to attain salvation]. Likewise both parties do not consider a person guilty of enormities to be out of the fold of ëmän nor do they feel that he will dwell in the fire [of Hell] for eternity.
(Source: Kashf al Bäri p. 576-581, vol. 1, Salimulläh Khän, Maktaba Jämi’a Färōqi’a, Karachi, Pakistan 1999)
The Increase and Decrease of Ëmän
Regarding the increase and decrease of ëmän the Greatest Imam, Abu Hanëfa has explained in Al Fiqh al Akbar, “The faith of the inhabitants of the heavens and earth neither increases nor decreases in terms of the articles of faith; it increases and decreases in certainty and conviction.”
Mullä `Ali Al-Qäri has elaborated this point in Minah al Rawd al Azhar by writing, “[The faith of the inhabitants of the heavens] i.e. the angels and the residents of Paradise [and earth] i.e. the prophets, the saints and all the believers from among the righteous and the sinful [neither increases nor decreases] i.e. in terms of the articles of faith. This is because when conviction (in the articles of faith) is not established (in one’s heart) it (really) falls under the category of doubt and uncertainty. According to theological experts, doubt does not avail (a person) in the line of creed (in anyway and hence he will not be a believer). Allāh the Exalted has declared, “...Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.” [10:36]
In reality ëmän, as Imam Al Räzi has stated, does not accept any increase or decrease in terms of the actual faith but rather in terms of conviction, for people vary in religious excellence as the Glorious One has alluded to in his statement, “And [mention] when Abraham said, "My Lord, show me how You give life to the dead." [Allāh] said, "Have you not believed?" He said, "Yes, but [I ask] only that my heart may be satisfied." [2:260].
Undoubtedly the certainty developed through eye witnessing (something) is far greater than certainty developed through knowledge.
... In conclusion the increase and decrease (in ëmän really) refers to its strength and weakness. (For example) conviction in the rising of the sun is far stronger (in a person’s heart) than his conviction in the beginning of the world despite the two being equal as items to believe in.
We know for a fact that the ëmän of individual people among this nation does not resemble the ëmän of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم or the ëmän of Abu Bakr, the Most Truthful رضى الله عنه in this regard. This is the meaning of the narration: If Abu Bakr’s, the Most Truthful رضى الله عنه ëmän were to be weighed against the ëmän of all the believers, his ëmän would outweigh theirs i.e. due to the excess of his conviction...”
Question:
Assalamualikum, I have learned that the difference between Ahl al-Sunna and other groups is the method in defining Imän. My question is, did Imam Abu Hanëfa define Imän differently than Ahl al-Sunna? According to him;
- What is the definition of Imän?
- Does Imän have different levels?
- Does Imän increase and decrease?
Answer:
The Definition of Ëmän
There are differences between the scholars of the Ahl al Sunna wal Jamä`a over the definition of ëmän.
Imam Bukhäri states, “Emän is a declaration and an action.”
Other scholars say, “Emän is to be convinced with the inner heart, to affirm with the tongue and to carry out actions with various parts of the body.” This description has been provided by the Ĥadëth Scholars (Muĥaddithën).
Imam Abu Hanëfa and the Islamic Theologians (Mutakallimën) claim, “Emän is to be convinced with the inner heart. Affirming [the faith] with the tongue is a condition (sharţ) to enforce the sacred law [upon a person] whereas doing righteous actions is the result of being convinced and among the fruits of ëmän.”
Imam Abu Hanëfa and Imam Tahäwi have also been recorded to have said that affirmation with the tongue is an integral pillar (rukn) of ëmän. According to another account Imam Abu Hanëfa and the Islamic Theologians (Mutakallimën) have declared the verbal affirmation to be a condition (sharţ).
In any case the point that is being made is that the Islamic Theologians and Imam Abu Hanëfa have described ëmän as ‘being convinced with the inner heart’ and have deemed [righteous] actions to be the result and the fruit of ëmän.
The Reason for these Differences
Shaykh Al Hind has explained, “The difference [in the description of ëmän between the Mutakallimën and the Muĥaddithën] is really due to the conditions that rose in each party’s respected era. During the time of the Greatest Imam, Abu Hanëfa and the Mutakallimën the Mu`tazila and the Khawärij had a tremendous influence on society. These people emphasized that [righteous] deeds are a part [i.e. an integral pillar] of ëmän. If a person failed to observe them he would end up in the fire [of Hell] forever. They also considered a person guilty of enormities to be out of the fold of ëmän. Therefore, in order to refute their claims, the Mutakallimën and Abu Hanëfa adopted this stance in which they stated that ëmän is simply being convinced with the inner heart. [Righteous] actions are only the result and fruits of ëmän, not its component.
The Muĥaddithën on the other hand lived in an era in which the [the corruption of the] Murji`a was very strong [in society]. These people attached absolutely no importance to [righteous] actions and claimed: Obedience [to the Creator] is of no benefit and being disobedient [to Him] does no harm [to one’s spirituality]. In order to rebut their crooked notions the Muĥaddithën declared [righteous] deeds to be a component of ëmän so that their significance would remain [in the hearts of the laity].
This is why a difference exists [between the Mutakallimën and the Muĥaddithën] over the description of ëmän. In reality neither group refuses to believe in the importance of [righteous] actions, for both believe that observing [righteous] deeds are necessary [to attain salvation]. Likewise both parties do not consider a person guilty of enormities to be out of the fold of ëmän nor do they feel that he will dwell in the fire [of Hell] for eternity.
(Source: Kashf al Bäri p. 576-581, vol. 1, Salimulläh Khän, Maktaba Jämi’a Färōqi’a, Karachi, Pakistan 1999)
The Increase and Decrease of Ëmän
Regarding the increase and decrease of ëmän the Greatest Imam, Abu Hanëfa has explained in Al Fiqh al Akbar, “The faith of the inhabitants of the heavens and earth neither increases nor decreases in terms of the articles of faith; it increases and decreases in certainty and conviction.”
Mullä `Ali Al-Qäri has elaborated this point in Minah al Rawd al Azhar by writing, “[The faith of the inhabitants of the heavens] i.e. the angels and the residents of Paradise [and earth] i.e. the prophets, the saints and all the believers from among the righteous and the sinful [neither increases nor decreases] i.e. in terms of the articles of faith. This is because when conviction (in the articles of faith) is not established (in one’s heart) it (really) falls under the category of doubt and uncertainty. According to theological experts, doubt does not avail (a person) in the line of creed (in anyway and hence he will not be a believer). Allāh the Exalted has declared, “...Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.” [10:36]
In reality ëmän, as Imam Al Räzi has stated, does not accept any increase or decrease in terms of the actual faith but rather in terms of conviction, for people vary in religious excellence as the Glorious One has alluded to in his statement, “And [mention] when Abraham said, "My Lord, show me how You give life to the dead." [Allāh] said, "Have you not believed?" He said, "Yes, but [I ask] only that my heart may be satisfied." [2:260].
Undoubtedly the certainty developed through eye witnessing (something) is far greater than certainty developed through knowledge.
... In conclusion the increase and decrease (in ëmän really) refers to its strength and weakness. (For example) conviction in the rising of the sun is far stronger (in a person’s heart) than his conviction in the beginning of the world despite the two being equal as items to believe in.
We know for a fact that the ëmän of individual people among this nation does not resemble the ëmän of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم or the ëmän of Abu Bakr, the Most Truthful رضى الله عنه in this regard. This is the meaning of the narration: If Abu Bakr’s, the Most Truthful رضى الله عنه ëmän were to be weighed against the ëmän of all the believers, his ëmän would outweigh theirs i.e. due to the excess of his conviction...”
And Allah Knows Best